Field notes
Encounter profile
Identified using iNaturalist, WoRMS.
Species profile
Phyllidia varicosa
Identified using iNaturalist, WoRMS.
Photographic identification review
3/9 exact media auditedPhyllidia varicosa
Probable assessment across 3 exact media items. The archive is currently filed as Phyllidia varicosa; a reviewed hypothesis is evidence, not a silent relabelling.
Archive ecology
SNAP observations, not the species’ full biological range.
Depth basis: 0 recorded, 1 profile-estimated, 7 contextual.
An early signal
8 environment-linked observations are available so far. More encounters will show whether a repeatable pattern emerges.
Repeatable archive pattern · 9 observations / 8 dives
Calendar-quarter observations
Camera-clock comparison
Creature trail

#8 · Aug 2, 2026
Gato Island
Malapascua, PH · Asia 2026

#7 · Jul 17, 2026
Coral Garden
Tawali, PNG · Asia 2026

#6 · Jul 17, 2026
Tawali Resort House Reef
Tawali, PNG · Asia 2026

#5 · Jul 15, 2026
Cobbs Cliff
Tawali, PNG · Asia 2026
Species field guide
Field notes
Identified using iNaturalist, WoRMS.
Identification audit
3 assessments across 3 exact media items. Each records who reviewed the image, when, what they concluded, and why. These assessments remain separate from iNaturalist computer vision and from the current canonical Gallery label.

Latest audit record
Reviewed by Codex identification research on Aug 29, 2026 · 86% reviewer confidence.
Reasoning recorded at review
Alternatives considered
Why plausible: P. haegeli is a documented varicosa mimic with longitudinal black lines, blue-grey ridges and yellow-capped tubercles.
Comparison: The photographed angle does not establish whether the anus is dorsal or ventral, which is the key external separator in the modern revision.
Why plausible: P. alyta shares a black-line and orange-tubercle pattern.
Comparison: The strong broad ridges, irregular branching bands and Papua New Guinea locality are not the western Indian Ocean P. alyta pattern described by Yonow; ventral and expert evidence would be required.

Latest audit record
Reviewed by Codex identification research on Aug 29, 2026 · 88% reviewer confidence.
Reasoning recorded at review
Alternatives considered
Why plausible: The modern revision warns that P. haegeli can be mistaken for P. varicosa from dorsal photographs and shares this colour-and-ridge combination.
Comparison: The frame contains dark dorsal markings but no opening can be identified confidently as the anus; a clear dorsal or ventral anal view is required.
Why plausible: P. alyta shares black dorsal lines and orange tubercles.
Comparison: Its western Indian Ocean account describes a more linear four-line pattern and smaller, less-developed ridges; a ventral sole view and expert assessment would be needed to support it here.

Latest audit record
Reviewed by Codex identification research on Aug 29, 2026 · 86% reviewer confidence.
Reasoning recorded at review
Alternatives considered
Why plausible: Papu et al. show that P. haegeli can closely mimic P. varicosa dorsally, including black longitudinal lines, blue-grey ridges and yellow-capped tubercles.
Comparison: A clearly documented dorsal versus ventral anal opening is needed; this frame does not expose the anal position unambiguously.
Why plausible: P. alyta also combines longitudinal black lines with linearly arranged orange tubercles and a dark sole line.
Comparison: The photographed animal has more developed broad ridges and branching black fields, and P. alyta is reported principally from the western Indian Ocean; a ventral view and expert comparison would be needed to revive this alternative.
Archive
9 media items
Optional context
Continue exploring
Species photographed on the same dives come first, followed by close taxonomic neighbours.





